Originally uploaded by Don Gru
A couple of weeks ago I blogged about the difference in the way the British and French press cover the European Union. I don’t want to harp on about the same subject but this week I came across an example of this which is too good not to share.
Last Sunday EU leaders held a meeting ahead of next month’s G20 summit with the hope of agreeing on a shared response to the economic downturn. If you read about it the next day in the British and French press you might think they were describing two different events.
A double page spread in The Times, under the heading “Suspicion and self interest behind European Union rift” painted a picture of great discord. As well as a graphic illustration of divided Europe, the article concentrated on the aspects which separated the leaders:
“The meeting was overshadowed by a cacophony of competing interests and the rejection of a cry for help from Eastern Europe, even though delegates agreed in a final statement to cooperate and fight protectionism.”
In complete contrast, many of the French newspapers chose to focus on the fact the EU leaders agreed to reject protectionism. To give just one example, A Libération blogger chose to end his post, “Union européenne: l’ouest réaffirme sa solidarité avec l’est face à la crise”, with the following quote:
“Les Vingt-sept ont fermement souligné que « le protectionnisme n’est pas la réponse à la crise actuelle.”